Development and validation of a screening tool for early identification of bloodstream infection in older patients - a retrospective case-control study.
Clicks: 316
ID: 76808
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
79.5
/100
316 views
253 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Delayed diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI) occurs in >β20% of older patients, with misdiagnosis in 35%. Our objective was to develop and validate a clinically useful screening tool to identify older patients with a high probability of having a BSI.Hospitalized patients >β80βyears old with BSI (nΒ =β105/group) were evaluated for the tool development in this retrospective matched case-controlled study (learn cohort). The tool was validated in different retrospectively matched case and control patients >β80βyears old (nΒ =β120/group) and 65 to 79βyears old (nΒ =β250/group) (test cohort). Binary logistic regression was used to develop a screening tool using laboratory and clinical parameters that were significantly associated with BSI (PΒ <β0.05; adjusted odds ratio (OR)β>β1); and Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was used to identify parameter breakpoints. Performance metrics were used to evaluate and validate the tool.The significant parameters associated with BSI were maximum temperature (Tmax)(>β37.55C)(ORβ=β42.575), neutrophils (>β7.95)(ORβ=β1.923), a change in level of consciousness (LOC) (Yesβ=β1, Noβ=β0)(ORβ=β1.571), blood urea nitrogen (BUN)(>β10.05)(ORβ=β1.359), glucose (>β7.35)(ORβ=β1.167), albumin (<β33.5)(ORβ=β1.038) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (>β19.5)(ORβ=β1.005). The optimal screening tool [Ln (odds of BSI)β=β-β150.299β+β3.751(Tmax)β+β0.654(neutrophils)β+β0.452(change in LOC)β+β0.307(BUN)β+β0.154(glucose)β+β0.038(albumin)β+β0.005(ALT)] had favorable performance metrics in the learn and test cohorts (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 95% in the learn cohort and 77, 89, and 81% in the total test cohort); and performed better than using only temperature and neutrophil count.The validated tool had high predictive value which may improve early identification and management of BSI in older patients.Reference Key |
walker2020developmentbmc
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | Walker, Sandra A N;Bannerman, Heather;Ma, Nathan;Peragine, Christine;Elligsen, Marion;Palmay, Lesley;Williams, Evelyn;Liu, Barbara; |
Journal | bmc geriatrics |
Year | 2020 |
DOI | 10.1186/s12877-019-1402-x |
URL | |
Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.