Personal, Cognitive and Metacognitive Factors of Preservice Teachers’ Performance in the College-Based Leaving Examination: Mathematical Models

Clicks: 222
ID: 65689
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
This study examined some personal, cognitive and metacognitive factors that could predict the performance of the preservice teachers in the leaving examination, an institutionalized mock board examination given before their practice teaching deployment. Quantitative research designs were employed. Repeated-Measures ANOVA and Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression were used in the analysis. The study involved 100 preservice teachers who took the examination in the second semester of the academic year 2017-2018. They were asked to accomplish the Grit Scale, Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST), Academic Motivation Scale (AMS-College Version), and Learning Strategies Questionnaire (LSQ). The study revealed that grit, resource management learning strategy, and course influence (parents) were significant predictors of the preservice teachers’ performance in the general education leaving examination. On the other hand, the combination of metacognitive learning, resource management strategy, grit, and cognitive learning strategies significantly predicted the preservice teachers’ performance in professional education leaving examination.
Reference Key
derilo2019personalinternational Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Derilo, Reymund C.;
Journal international journal of social sciences & educational studies
Year 2019
DOI DOI not found
URL
http://ijsses.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Personal-Cognitive-and-Metacognitive-Factors-of-Preservice-Teachers%E2%80%99-Performance-in-the-College-Based-Leaving-Examination-Mathematical-Mo
Keywords
Medicine (General) Medicine Technology Science (General) psychology social sciences (general) education (general) philology. linguistics special aspects of education english literature industrial psychology

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.