Present criteria for prophylactic ICD implantation: Insights from the EU-CERT-ICD (Comparative Effectiveness Research to Assess the Use of Primary ProphylacTic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in EUrope) project.

Clicks: 284
ID: 47599
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The clinical effectiveness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is under debate. It is urgently needed to better identify patients who benefit from prophylactic ICD therapy. The EUropean Comparative Effectiveness Research to Assess the Use of Primary ProphylacTic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (EU-CERT-ICD) completed in 2019 will assess this issue.The EU-CERT-ICD is a prospective investigator-initiated non-randomized, controlled, multicenter observational cohort study done in 44 centers across 15 European countries. A total of 2327 patients with heart failure due to ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy indicated for primary prophylactic ICD implantation were recruited between 2014 and 2018 (>1500 patients at first ICD implantation, >750 patients non-randomized non-ICD control group). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and first appropriate shock was co-primary endpoint. At baseline, all patients underwent 12‑lead ECG and Holter-ECG analysis using multiple advanced methods for risk stratification as well as documentation of clinical characteristics and laboratory values. The EU-CERT-ICD data will provide much needed information on the survival benefit of preventive ICD therapy and expand on previous prospective risk stratification studies which showed very good applicability of clinical parameters and advanced risk stratifiers in order to define patient subgroups with above or below average ICD benefit.The EU-CERT-ICD study will provide new and current data about effectiveness of primary prophylactic ICD implantation. The study also aims for improved risk stratification and patient selection using clinical risk markers in general, and advanced ECG risk markers in particular.
Reference Key
zabel2019presentjournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Zabel, Markus;Schlögl, Simon;Lubinski, Andrzej;Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup;Bauer, Axel;Arbelo, Elena;Brusich, Sandro;Conen, David;Cygankiewicz, Iwona;Dommasch, Michael;Flevari, Panagiota;Galuszka, Jan;Hansen, Jim;Hasenfuß, Gerd;Hatala, Robert;Huikuri, Heikki V;Kenttä, Tuomas;Kucejko, Tomasz;Haarmann, Helge;Harden, Markus;Iovev, Svetoslav;Kääb, Stefan;Kaliska, Gabriela;Katsimardos, Andreas;Kasprzak, Jaroslaw D;Qavoq, Dariusz;Lüthje, Lars;Malik, Marek;Novotný, Tomáš;Pavlović, Nikola;Perge, Peter;Röver, Christian;Schmidt, Georg;Shalganov, Tchavdar;Sritharan, Rajeeva;Svetlosak, Martin;Sallo, Zoltan;Szavits-Nossan, Janko;Traykov, Vassil;Vandenberk, Bert;Velchev, Vasil;Vos, Marc A;Willich, Stefan N;Friede, Tim;Willems, Rik;Merkely, Béla;Sticherling, Christian;, ;
Journal journal of electrocardiology
Year 2019
DOI S0022-0736(19)30415-7
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.