Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews.

Clicks: 318
ID: 47179
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Six years after the launch of Systematic Reviews by Biomed Central, this article is part of the celebration of the journal. It contains personal reflections on the past, present and future of systematic reviews, using examples relevant to the role of systematic reviews in cataloguing and analysing research, assessing quality and planning new studies. The focus is on the most common of the various types of systematic review in health and social care, namely those assessing the effects of interventions.
Reference Key
clarke2018partiallysystematic Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Clarke, Mike;
Journal Systematic reviews
Year 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0833-3
URL
Keywords
endometriosis content analysis dysmenorrhea menorrhagia naturopathy traditional evidence

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.