Reassessing the labor market effects of California's minimum nurse staffing regulations.

Clicks: 308
ID: 37881
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
California implemented hospital-unit level licensed nurse minimum staffing regulations in 2004, with more stringent regulations applying for certain units in 2005 and 2008. All analyses agree that there were significant increases in Registered Nurse (RN) staffing levels, especially in hospitals with lower preregulation staffing. Analyses of the labor market effects of the regulations, however, come to mixed conclusions. I revisit the labor market effects of the regulations using different data and a different analytical model for RN wages. For the analysis of growth of RN employment, I use information from the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses, the largest and most complete source of information on nurse employment, and find that RN employment grew significantly faster in California than in other states after the regulations were implemented. For the analysis of changes in RN wages, I apply a panel difference-in-difference-in-difference model to wage averages in Metropolitan Statistical Areas, controlling for MSA-, occupation-, and time-fixed effects, and all their two-way interactions. Analysis of changes in the differential between RN wages and wages in four other selected occupations indicates significant growth in RN wages after the regulations were implemented.
Reference Key
harless2019reassessinghealth Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Harless, David W;
Journal Health economics
Year 2019
DOI 10.1002/hec.3924
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.