The head control scale: Development, inter-rater reliability, and utility.
Clicks: 201
ID: 34433
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Star Article
69.1
/100
201 views
161 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
This study introduces a new scale for the assessment of head control called the Head Control Scale (HCS). The purpose of this study was to establish interrater reliability of the HCS and to determine its usefulness in a clinical setting.The HCS assesses head control in four positions (prone, supine, pull to sit, and supported sitting) on a 0-4 rating scale. The authors used both a focus group and pilot testing to refine the scale to its final version, which was then used to assess interrater reliability. Twenty-six therapists used the HCS to evaluate head control of five subjects of varying ages and abilities who were videotaped spending 30-40 seconds in each position. Participants also completed a post-rating survey.Fleiss's weighted kappa coefficient is excellent for the prone (0.82), pull to sit (0.83), and sitting (0.88) positions as well as for the scale overall (kappa = 0.91). It can be described as fair to good for supine (kappa = 0.68).The HCS has high interrater reliability and users report it to be a needed tool, applicable to clinical practice, and easy to use.The results of this study indicate that the HCS has great potential for clinical use.Reference Key |
thomas2019thejournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | Thomas, Jodi;Armstrong-Heimsoth, Amy;Laurent, Roy St; |
Journal | journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine |
Year | 2019 |
DOI | 10.3233/PRM-180574 |
URL | |
Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.