Liver Cancer Knowledge Graph Construction based on dynamic entity replacement and masking strategies RoBERTa-BiLSTM-CRF model
Clicks: 19
ID: 282816
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
1 views
1 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Background: Liver cancer ranks as the fifth most common malignant tumor and the second most fatal in our country. Early diagnosis is crucial, necessitating that physicians identify liver cancer in patients at the earliest possible stage. However, the diagnostic process is complex and demanding. Physicians must analyze a broad spectrum of patient data, encompassing physical condition, symptoms, medical history, and results from various examinations and tests, recorded in both structured and unstructured medical formats. This results in a significant workload for healthcare professionals. In response, integrating knowledge graph technology to develop a liver cancer knowledge graph-assisted diagnosis and treatment system aligns with national efforts toward smart healthcare. Such a system promises to mitigate the challenges faced by physicians in diagnosing and treating liver cancer. Methods: This paper addresses the major challenges in building a knowledge graph for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis, such as the discrepancy between public data sources and real electronic medical records, the effective integration of which remains a key issue. The knowledge graph construction process consists of six steps: conceptual layer design, data preprocessing, entity identification, entity normalization, knowledge fusion, and graph visualization. A novel Dynamic Entity Replacement and Masking Strategy (DERM) for named entity recognition is proposed. Results: A knowledge graph for liver cancer was established, including 7 entity types such as disease, symptom, and constitution, containing 1495 entities. The recognition accuracy of the model was 93.23%, the recall was 94.69%, and the F1 score was 93.96%.Reference Key |
fang2024liver
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | YiChi Zhang; HaiLing Wang; YongBin Gao; XiaoJun Hu; YingFang Fan; ZhiJun Fang |
Journal | arXiv |
Year | 2024 |
DOI | DOI not found |
URL | |
Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.