Clinical outcome after total neoadjuvant treatment (CAO/ARO/AIO-12) versus intensified neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment (CAO/ARO/AIO-04) A comparison between two multicenter randomized phase II/III trials.

Clicks: 101
ID: 276105
2022
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) can enhance local tumor regression, but its survival benefits compared to intensified chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) remain unclear.This is a secondary comparison between 607 patients treated with intensified 5-FU/Oxaliplatin neoadjuvant CRT and adjuvant CT within the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial, and 306 patients treated with TNT within the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 phase II trial. Comparison between clinical-pathological characteristics, surgical quality, and post-surgical complications were analyzed using the Pearson's Chi-squared or Mann-Whitney U test. Oncological outcome was examined with log-rank, Gray's test, and multivariate cox regression. In addition, further subgroup analyses and propensity score matching were performed to optimize the balance of baseline covariates. Findings Patients treated with CRT followed by consolidation CT had a significantly higher rate of pathological complete remission (pCR) compared to patients treated within the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial (25.3% vs 17.3%, P=0.04). Post-surgical complications were less common in the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial. After a median follow-up of 46 months, clinical outcome did not differ significantly in the overall cohort, in any subgroup or after propensity score matching. In multivariate analysis, disease-free survival (DFS) was similar between the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial and treatments arms of the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial (vs arm A: HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.62-1.37], P=0.69; vs arm B: HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.72-1.58], P=0.76). Interpretation Notwithstanding the limitations of intertrial comparison, TNT did not improve long term oncological outcome in our study compared to the intensified neoadjuvant CRT and adjuvant CT treatment in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial. Improved response rates after TNT offers an attractive option to explore organ preservation in selective patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Reference Key
diefenhardt2022clinicalradiotherapy Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Diefenhardt, Markus;Fleischmann, Maximillian;Martin, Daniel;Hofheinz, Ralf-Dieter;Piso, Pompiliu;Germer, Christoph-Thomas;Hambsch, Peter;Grützmann, Robert;Kirste, Simon;Schlenska-Lange, Anke;Ghadimi, Michael;Rödel, Claus;Fokas, Emmanouil;, ;
Journal Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Year 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.109455
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.