Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio
Clicks: 308
ID: 270768
2003
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
0 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Cox or Poisson regression with robust variance and log-binomial regression provide correct estimates and are a better alternative for the analysis of cross-sectional studies with binary outcomes than logistic regression, since the prevalence ratio is more interpretable and easier to communicate to n …
| Reference Key |
aj2003bmcalternatives
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Barros AJ;Hirakata VN;; |
| Journal | BMC medical research methodology |
| Year | 2003 |
| DOI | DOI not found |
| URL | |
| Keywords |
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
humans
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
logistic models
models
research support
non-u.s. gov't
Comparative Study
linear models
Evaluation Study
Proportional Hazards Models
odds ratio
statistical*
prevalence
empirical research
pmid:14567763
pmc521200
doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-21
aluísio j d barros
vânia n hirakata
cross-sectional studies*
poisson distribution
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.