Mobility analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 5): Impact of five common prosthetic ankle-foot categories for individuals with diabetic/dysvascular amputation.
Clicks: 220
ID: 22415
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Star Article
72.2
/100
220 views
176 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Diabetes and vascular disease represent the most common etiologies for lower limb amputations. In lower limb loss rehabilitation, the prosthetic ankle-foot mechanism is the most common major component needed to restore function. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of five common prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms on functional mobility in a large sample of individuals with amputation due to diabetes/dysvascular disease.A retrospective analysis of the Prosthetic Limb Users' Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M®) captured in the patient care setting. A total of 738 individuals were included and subsequently subdivided into five groups based on the ankle-foot mechanism of their current prosthesis. Groups were compared using a general linear univariate model with age, body mass index, comorbid health status, time since amputation, and amputation level entered as covariates.The microprocessor ankle-foot group had the highest mobility (F = 3.845, p=0.004), which was followed by the vertical loading pylon type ankle-foot, the hydraulic ankle-foot, the flex-walk-type ankle-foot, and lastly the flex-foot-type ankle-foot.These results demonstrate that the selection of different prosthetic ankle-foot technology directly impacts functional mobility for the patient with an amputation due to diabetes and/or vascular disease.
Reference Key |
wurdemanmobilityjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | Wurdeman, Shane R;Stevens, Phillip M;Campbell, James H; |
Journal | journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering |
Year | Year not found |
DOI | 10.1177/2055668318820784 |
URL | |
Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.