making data sharing count: a publication-based solution

Clicks: 188
ID: 220524
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The neuroimaging community has been increasingly called up to openly share data. Although data sharing has been a cornerstone of large-scale data consortia, the incentive for the individual researcher remains unclear. Other fields have benefited from embracing a data publication form—the data paper—that allows researchers to publish their dataset as a citable scientific publication. Such publishing mechanisms both give credit that is recognizable within the scientific ecosystem, and also ensures the quality of the published data and metadata through the peer review process. We discuss the specific challenges of adapting data papers to the needs of the neuroimaging community, and we propose guidelines for the structure as well as review process.
Reference Key
egorgolewski2013frontiersmaking Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Krzysztof eGorgolewski;Daniel S. Margulies;Michael P. Milham
Journal Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry
Year 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2013.00009
URL
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2013.00009/full
Keywords
data quality peer review data sharing credit assignment neuropsychiatry biological psychiatry data paperneurosciences

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.