The past, present, and future in the nomenclature and structure representation of inorganic compounds.
Clicks: 169
ID: 19983
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
66.9
/100
169 views
135 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
This review examines the origins and development of the compositional nomenclature and additive nomenclature that have been at the heart of formal descriptions of inorganic compounds since the times of Lavoisier and Werner, respectively. The rising importance of structural diagrams is noted, explained and correlated with a decreasing use of formal nomenclature. The future of structure representation is discussed, particularly in relation to cheminformatics and big data. International variations in nomenclature are discussed with reference to the recently published Brief Guide to the Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry and its translations, and implications of increasing internationalisation of chemistry for the integrity of regional languages are discussed.Reference Key |
hartshorn2019thedalton
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | Hartshorn, Richard M;Yerin, Andrey; |
Journal | Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003) |
Year | 2019 |
DOI | 10.1039/c9dt00352e |
URL | |
Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.