between hobbes and spinoza. research on the philosophical matrix of ferdinand tönnies’ sociological categories
Clicks: 95
ID: 194573
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
1 views
1 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
This essay reconstructs the main lines of Ferdinand Tönnies’ (1855-1936) critical approach to the thought of Hobbes and Spinoza. Specifically it shows the role played by the two philosophers in developing the categories of community (Spinoza) and society (Hobbes). From the stand point of political thought, the essay reveals how Tönnies’ on going interpretation of Hobbes focuses more and more on the constitutive moment of the modern form of State. In this area it draws on Spinoza’s reflections on democracy as an absolutum omnino imperium. Tönnies is thus able to distinguish conceptually between the Hobbesian State, as a “society” that absorbs all natural law, and its natural law origin (the «original assembly»), where we find a “common” element that can never be entirely neutralized by the State.Reference Key |
ferraresi2017scienzabetween
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | ;Furio Ferraresi |
Journal | european journal of political theory |
Year | 2017 |
DOI | 10.6092/issn.1825-9618/7103 |
URL | |
Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.