triage strategies in cervical cancer detection in mexico: methods of the frida study

Clicks: 218
ID: 178905
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Objective. This paper describes the study design and base- line characteristics of the study population, including the first 30 829 women who enrolled in the Forwarding Research for Improved Detection and Access for Cervical Cancer Screening and Triage (FRIDA Study). This is a large population based study that is evaluating the performance and cost-effective-ness of different triage strategies for high-risk HPV (hrHPV) positive women in Mexico. Materials and methods. The target population is more than 100 000 women aged 30 to 64 years who attend the Cervical Cancer Screening Program in 100 health centers in the state of Tlaxcala, Mexico. Since August 2013, all women in the region have been invited to enroll in the study. The study participants are evaluated to determine hrHPV infection using the Cobas 4800 HPV test. The HPV-16/18 genotyping and cytology triage strategies are performed as reflex tests in all hrHPV-positive participants. Women with a positive HPV-16/18 test and/or abnormal cytology (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse, ASCUS+) are referred for colposcopy evaluation, where a minimum of four biopsies and an endocervical sample are systematically collected. Histologic confirmation is performed by a standardized panel of pathologists. Results. Among the 30 829 women who have been screened, the overall prevalence of hrHPV is 11.0%. The overall prevalence of HPV16 and HPV18 are 1.5% and 0.7%, respectively. Cytological abnormalities (ASCUS+) were detected in 11.8% of the hrHPV-positive women. A total of 27.0% (920/3,401) of the hrHPV-positive women were referred to colposcopy because of a positive HPV16/18 test and/or abnormal reflex cytology, (31.6% had only ASCUS+, 53.6% were HPV16/18 positive with a normal cytology result, and 9.5% were positive to both triage tests). Conclusion. The results of this study will help policy makers and health service providers establish the best practices for triage in cervical cancer screening in Mexico and other countries. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21149/spm.v58i2.7789
Reference Key
torres-ibarra2016saludtriage Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Leticia Torres-Ibarra;Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce;Eduardo L Franco;Jack Cuzick;Mauricio Hernåndez-Ávila;Attila Lorincz;Berenice Rivera;Paula Ramírez;Indira Mendiola-Pastrana;Samantha E Rudolph;Leith León-Maldonad;Rubí Hernåndez;Elizabeth Barrios;Patti Gravitt;Anna Barbara Moscicki;Kathleen M Schmeler;Yvonne N Flores;Pablo MÊndez-Hernåndez;Jorge Salmerón;FRIDA Study Group*
Journal journal of anatomy
Year 2016
DOI DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.