the image ofan ideal psychiatrist inthe eyes of medical students, patients and doctors involved inpsychiatric care

Clicks: 224
ID: 169093
2013
Aim: The aim of the study was to determine differences in the image of ideal psychiatrist (IIP) among patients, doctors involved in psychiatric care and medical students and also between individuals with different work experience (doctors vs. students). The psychiatrist’s personality seems an important factor in supporting therapeutic process; therefore it is worth searching for the patient’s needs. Materials and methods: Three groups participated in the study: patients of the psychiatric units, medical students of 6th year and psychiatrists. The Gough and Heilbrun ACL (Adjective Check List) – based on Mur‑ ray’s theory of needs – was used to assess IIP. Results: Data analysis revealed statistically significant differences among patients, doctors and students involving five scales: Nurturance, Aggression, Change, Succorance and Deference. Patients had lower scores on Change scale than doctors and higher scores on the Nurturance, Succurance and Deference than stu‑ dents. Psychiatrists had higher scores on Nurturance and Deference scale and lower score on Aggression scale than students. Conclusions: The findings showed differences in the expectations of patients compared to those of students and doctors. The most significant difference that was observed involved the Change. It may indicate that patients prefer order, conventional approach and stability in psychiatrist’s personality traits more commonly than doctors. Study findings suggest that work experience has impact on IIP: with increasing work experience, opinion about IIP comes closer to patients’ expectations.
Reference Key
margulska2013psychiatriathe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Aleksandra Margulska;Aleksandra Kobusiewicz;Agnieszka Pawełczyk;Tomasz Pawełczyk;Jolanta Rabe-Jabłońska
Journal international journal of disclosure and governance
Year 2013
DOI DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.