Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: long-term results of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Clicks: 275
ID: 12065
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Initial 3-year results from our clinical trial in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients showed that induction chemotherapy (IC) with cisplatin and fluorouracil resulted in improved disease-free survival (DFS) with a marginally significant effect on distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), but the effect of IC on locoregional relapse-free survival and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly. Here, we present 5-year follow-up results.Our trial was a randomised, open-label phase III trial comparing IC followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus CCRT alone in patients with stage III-IVB (except T3N0-1) NPC. The IC followed by CCRT group received cisplatin (80 mg/m d1) and fluorouracil (800 mg/m d1-5) every 3 weeks for two cycles before CCRT. Both groups were treated with 80 mg/m cisplatin every 3 weeks concurrently with radiotherapy. The primary end-points were DFS and DMFS. We did efficacy analyses in the 476 randomised patients (intention-to-treat population).After a median follow-up of 82.6 months, the 5-year DFS rate was 73.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67.7-79.1) in the IC followed by CCRT group and 63.1% (95% CI 56.8-69.4) in the CCRT alone group (p = 0.007). The 5-year DMFS rate was also significantly higher in the IC followed by CCRT group (82.8%, 95% CI 77.9-87.7) than in the CCRT alone group (73.1%, 95% CI 67.2-79.0, p = 0.014). Our updated analysis revealed an OS benefit of IC: the 5-year OS rate was 80.8% in the IC followed by CCRT group versus 76.8% in the CCRT alone group (p = 0.040). The proportion of patients with eye damage was significantly higher in the CCRT alone group than the IC followed by CCRT group (16.4% [39/238] versus 9.7% [23/238], p = 0.029).IC followed by CCRT provides long-term DFS, DMFS and OS benefits compared with CCRT alone in locoregionally advanced NPC and, therefore, can be recommended for these patients.
Reference Key
yang2019inductioneuropean Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Yang, Qi;Cao, Su-Mei;Guo, Ling;Hua, Yi-Jun;Huang, Pei-Yu;Zhang, Xiao-Long;Lin, Mei;You, Rui;Zou, Xiong;Liu, You-Ping;Xie, Yu-Long;Wang, Zhi-Qiang;Mai, Hai-Qiang;Chen, Qiu-Yan;Tang, Lin-Quan;Mo, Hao-Yuan;Cao, Ka-Jia;Qian, Chao-Nan;Zhao, Chong;Xiang, Yan-Qun;Zhang, Xiu-Ping;Lin, Zhi-Xiong;Li, Wei-Xiong;Liu, Qing;Li, Ji-Bin;Ling, Li;Guo, Xiang;Hong, Ming-Huang;Chen, Ming-Yuan;
Journal European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
Year 2019
DOI S0959-8049(19)30407-1
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.