Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: long-term results of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Clicks: 275
ID: 12065
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
66.1
/100
275 views
220 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Initial 3-year results from our clinical trial in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients showed that induction chemotherapy (IC) with cisplatin and fluorouracil resulted in improved disease-free survival (DFS) with a marginally significant effect on distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), but the effect of IC on locoregional relapse-free survival and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly. Here, we present 5-year follow-up results.Our trial was a randomised, open-label phase III trial comparing IC followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus CCRT alone in patients with stage III-IVB (except T3N0-1) NPC. The IC followed by CCRT group received cisplatin (80 mg/m d1) and fluorouracil (800 mg/m d1-5) every 3 weeks for two cycles before CCRT. Both groups were treated with 80 mg/m cisplatin every 3 weeks concurrently with radiotherapy. The primary end-points were DFS and DMFS. We did efficacy analyses in the 476 randomised patients (intention-to-treat population).After a median follow-up of 82.6 months, the 5-year DFS rate was 73.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67.7-79.1) in the IC followed by CCRT group and 63.1% (95% CI 56.8-69.4) in the CCRT alone group (p = 0.007). The 5-year DMFS rate was also significantly higher in the IC followed by CCRT group (82.8%, 95% CI 77.9-87.7) than in the CCRT alone group (73.1%, 95% CI 67.2-79.0, p = 0.014). Our updated analysis revealed an OS benefit of IC: the 5-year OS rate was 80.8% in the IC followed by CCRT group versus 76.8% in the CCRT alone group (p = 0.040). The proportion of patients with eye damage was significantly higher in the CCRT alone group than the IC followed by CCRT group (16.4% [39/238] versus 9.7% [23/238], p = 0.029).IC followed by CCRT provides long-term DFS, DMFS and OS benefits compared with CCRT alone in locoregionally advanced NPC and, therefore, can be recommended for these patients.Reference Key |
yang2019inductioneuropean
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | Yang, Qi;Cao, Su-Mei;Guo, Ling;Hua, Yi-Jun;Huang, Pei-Yu;Zhang, Xiao-Long;Lin, Mei;You, Rui;Zou, Xiong;Liu, You-Ping;Xie, Yu-Long;Wang, Zhi-Qiang;Mai, Hai-Qiang;Chen, Qiu-Yan;Tang, Lin-Quan;Mo, Hao-Yuan;Cao, Ka-Jia;Qian, Chao-Nan;Zhao, Chong;Xiang, Yan-Qun;Zhang, Xiu-Ping;Lin, Zhi-Xiong;Li, Wei-Xiong;Liu, Qing;Li, Ji-Bin;Ling, Li;Guo, Xiang;Hong, Ming-Huang;Chen, Ming-Yuan; |
Journal | European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) |
Year | 2019 |
DOI | S0959-8049(19)30407-1 |
URL | |
Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.