A randomized controlled trial of incision and drainage versus ultrasonographically guided needle aspiration for skin abscesses and the effect of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Clicks: 227
ID: 118556
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
1 views
1 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Ultrasonographically guided needle aspiration is insufficient therapy for skin abscesses. The presence of CA-MRSA decreases the success of both incision and drainage and ultrasonographically guided needle aspiration.| Reference Key |
rj2011annalsa
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Gaspari RJ;Resop D;Mendoza M;Kang T;Blehar D;; |
| Journal | Annals of emergency medicine |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI | DOI not found |
| URL | |
| Keywords |
biopsy
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
humans
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
treatment outcome
adult
female
male
Comparative Study
Prospective Studies
Randomized Controlled Trial
staphylococcal skin infections / microbiology
ultrasonography
abscess / microbiology
methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus*
pmid:21239082
doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.11.021
romolo j gaspari
dana resop
david blehar
abscess / surgery*
fine-needle / methods*
drainage*
staphylococcal skin infections / surgery*
interventional / methods*
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.