The Titanium-Coated PEEK Cage Maintains Better Bone Fusion with the Endplate than the PEEK Cage 6 Months After PLIF Surgery-A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study.
Clicks: 255
ID: 100472
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
73.2
/100
255 views
204 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial.To investigate interbody bone fusion rates in titanium-coated polyetheretherketone (TiPEEK) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery.Previous clinical studies have not revealed any significant difference in bone fusion rates between TiPEEK and PEEK cages.During one-level PLIF surgery, 149 patients (84 men, 65 women, mean age 67 years) were randomly allocated to use either a TiPEEK cage (nā=ā69) or PEEK cage (nā=ā80). Blinded radiographic evaluations were performed using computed tomography (CT) and assessed by modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis in 149 cases and per-protocol (PP) analysis in 143 cases who were followed for 12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).The interbody union rate at 12 months after surgery was 45% owing to a very strict definition of bone fusion. The rates of bone fusion were significantly higher at 4 and 6 months after surgery in the TiPEEK group than in the PEEK group in the unadjusted mITT analysis and were significantly higher at 6 months in the unadjusted PP analysis. Binary logistic regression analysis adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, bone mineral density, and surgical level showed that using a TiPEEK cage (odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-4.74; pā=ā0.03) was independently associated with bone fusion at 6 months after surgery. JOABPEQ and ODI results improved postoperatively in both groups.Using the TiPEEK cage for PLIF enabled the maintenance of better bone fusion to the endplate than using the PEEK cage at 6 months after the surgery. Our findings suggest the possibility of an earlier return to rigorous work or sports by the use of TiPEEK cage.1.Reference Key |
hasegawa2020thespine
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | Hasegawa, Tomohiko;Ushirozako, Hiroki;Shigeto, Ebata;Ohba, Tetsuro;Oba, Hiroki;Mukaiyama, Keijiro;Shimizu, Satoshi;Yamato, Yu;Ide, Koichiro;Shibata, Yosuke;Ojima, Toshiyuki;Takahashi, Jun;Haro, Hirotaka;Matsuyama, Yukihiro; |
Journal | Spine |
Year | 2020 |
DOI | 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003464 |
URL | |
Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.