Assessment of Health Care Utilization and Cost of Targeted Drug Delivery and Conventional Medical Management vs Conventional Medical Management Alone for Patients With Cancer-Related Pain.
Clicks: 164
ID: 100094
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
1 views
1 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Targeted drug delivery (TDD) has potential for cost savings compared with conventional medical management (CMM). Despite positive clinical and economic evidence, TDD remains underused to treat cancer pain.To assess the cost of TDD and CMM in treating cancer-related pain.This retrospective economic evaluation using propensity score-matched analysis was conducted using MarketScan commercial claims data on beneficiaries receiving TDD and CMM or CMM only for cancer pain from January 1, 2009, to September 30, 2015. Participants were matched on age, sex, cancer type, comorbidity score, and pre-enrollment characteristics. Data analysis was performed from June 1 to September 30, 2017.Total 2-, 6-, and 12-month costs, number of health care encounters, length of hospital stay, additional components of cost, and health care utilization.A total of 376 TDD and CMM patients (mean [SD] age, 51.88 [9.98] years; 216 [57.5%] female) and 4839 CMM only patients (mean [SD] age, 51.52 [11.16] years; 3005 [62.1%] female) were identified for study inclusion. After matching, 536 patients were included in the study: 268 patients in the TDD and CMM group and 268 in the CMM only group. Compared with CMM only, TDD and CMM was associated with mean total cost savings of $15āÆ142 (95% CI, $3690 to $26āÆ594; Pā=ā.01) at 2 months and $63āÆ498 (95% CI, $4620 to $122āÆ376; Pā=ā.03) at 12 months; cost savings at 6 months were not statistically different ($19 577; 95% CI, -$12 831 to $51 984; Pā=ā.24). The TDD and CMM group had fewer inpatient visits (2-month mean difference [MD], 1.0; 95% CI, 0.8-1.2; Pā<ā.001; 6-month MD, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8-1.7; Pā<ā.001; 12-month MD, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4; Pā<ā.001) and shorter hospital stays (2-month MD, 6.8 days; 95% CI, 5.0-8.7 days; Pā<ā.001; 6-month MD, 6.8 days; 95% CI, 3.1-10.5 days; Pā<ā.001; 12-month MD, 10.6 days; 95% CI, 2.9-18.3 days; Pā=ā.007). Use of CMM only was associated with greater opioid use at 12 months (MD, 3.2; 95% CI, 0.4-6.0; Pā=ā.03).Compared with CMM alone, TDD and CMM together were associated with significantly lower cost and health care utilization. The findings suggest that TDD is a cost-saving therapy that should be considered in patients with cancer for whom oral opioids are inadequate or produce intolerable adverse effects and should be expanded as health care systems transition to value-based models.Reference Key |
stearns2019assessmentjama
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | Stearns, Lisa J;Narang, Sanjeet;Albright, Robert E;Hammond, Krisstin;Xia, Ying;Richter, Heather Basara;Paramanandam, Gobi K;Haagenson, Kelly K;Doth, Alissa H; |
Journal | JAMA network open |
Year | 2019 |
DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1549 |
URL | |
Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.